I have a new piece up at
Just Security entitled "
Why Federal Agencies Must Still Preserve (and Should Finally Read) the SSCI Torture Report" that digs down on the legal status of the SSCI Report under the federal records laws. It begins:
This week’s news that the CIA’s Office of Inspector
General destroyed
two copies of the SSCI Report on the CIA’s Detention and Interrogation
Program comes on the heels of last week’s DC Circuit decision
in ACLU v. CIA that the SSCI Report is
not an “agency record” subject to the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). The ACLU v. CIA decision is another setback for
transparency over torture and means that a review of the complete 6,700-page
Report for public release will not come through FOIA anytime soon.
The DC Circuit’s decision does not mean, however, that agencies can destroy their copies of
the SSCI Report or return them to the SSCI, as Sen. Richard Burr demanded earlier (and has apparently
repeated since the DC Circuit’s decision). Agencies should still have to
preserve their copies of the SSCI Report as agency “records” under federal
recordkeeping laws, which should free them to finally open the Report, read it, and learn the full history of our use of torture
in order to never repeat it – precisely what the SSCI intended in the first
place. Unfortunately, the official empowered to make a determination binding on
all agencies that the Report is a “record” – the Archivist of the United States
– has thus far been reluctant to
enter the fray despite demands from Sens. Dianne
Feinstein (D-Calif.) and Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.), as well as a group of NGOs. Perhaps
the realization that the lack of a mandate from the Archivist could have already
contributed to the CIA’s “inadvertent” destruction of two copies of the Report –
and the DC Circuit’s FOIA decision –– will finally persuade the Archivist that he
must act to protect agency copies of the Report.
Previous coverage of the status of the SSCI Report on this blog is
here and previous coverage of the Archivist's authority to determine record status is
here.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.